Term vs Whole Life Insurance Calculator

U.S. only tools

A whole-life premium is several times a term premium for the same death benefit, and the extra money buys something real: part of every whole-life dollar goes into a cash value the policy credits interest on. The term side puts that same difference into an ordinary investment instead. Both households commit the same monthly outflow; the question this page answers is where the money grows faster, over the exact length of the term.

Used for what the term cost runs out to. The term policy has to be renewed at the end, at a higher price, and the purpose of the strategy is to still be in the market at that age.

$

The death benefit both policies must provide, so the comparison is apples to apples. The page shows the term price per $1,000 of this amount.

How long the term premium is level for. The invested side runs the same length, so the two sides race on equal ground.

$

The monthly premium of the term policy, from a quote for this face amount and this term length.

$

The monthly level premium of the whole-life policy, from a quote for the same face amount. The difference over the term premium is what this page invests.

The annual rate the policy’s cash value is assumed to be credited at. Whole-life crediting is not a guaranteed market return.

The annual rate the invested difference is assumed to earn. Markets go down too; a long horizon is part of why the strategy is run for the whole term.

$

Money beyond the two premiums. Both sides can put it to work: the invested account directly, or into the policy as paid-up additions, so the comparison stays fair.

Results update as you type. Nothing leaves your device.

Currency symbol

Symbol only - nothing is converted and no exchange rate is used. Figures quoted in the explanation text stay as the sources publish them.

Investing beats the policy cash value by

$30,830.40

$200.00 a month for 20 years, then the policy renews dearer than this page assumes

Cover amount
$500,000

The same two premiums, recombined

Term premium
$35.00 a month
Whole-life premium
$235.00 a month, level
Invested each month
$200.00 the premium gap, plus your extra
Term side after 20 years
$104,185 assumed 7% a year
Policy cash value after 20 years
$73,355 credited at 4% a year

The same $200.00 a month, two places

YearTerm + investedWhole-life cash valueDifference
1$2,478.52$2,444.49$34.03
2$5,136.21$4,988.58$147.63
3$7,986.02$7,636.31$349.71
4$11,041.85$10,391.92$649.93
5$14,318.58$13,259.80$1,058.78
6$17,832.19$16,244.51$1,587.68
7$21,599.80$19,350.83$2,248.97
8$25,639.76$22,583.71$3,056.05
9$29,971.78$25,948.29$4,023.49
10$34,616.96$29,449.96$5,167.00
11$39,597.94$33,094.29$6,503.65
12$44,939.00$36,887.10$8,051.90
13$50,666.16$40,834.43$9,831.73
14$56,807.34$44,942.58$11,864.76
15$63,392.46$49,218.10$14,174.36
16$70,453.62$53,667.81$16,785.81
17$78,025.24$58,298.81$19,726.43
18$86,144.21$63,118.49$23,025.72
19$94,850.09$68,134.53$26,715.56
20$104,185.33$73,354.93$30,830.40

The term side exists only if the term premium is actually invested. Both sides commit the same $200.00 each month; the difference is where it is allowed to grow.

The difference is the price of the guarantee. The whole-life side keeps paying out for life and carries an insurer-backed cash value; the invested side has no such promise, and what it is worth at year 20 is a forecast, not a guarantee. If the invested rate lands below the crediting rate, the line flips the other way.
Not modelled: taxes (whole-life cash value grows tax-deferred and the term side’s gains are taxable), fees, policy dividends, and the sharply higher premium when the term runs out and has to be renewed. The assumed rates are inputs, not promises, and insurance pricing is your quotes only - this page recombines them, it does not price them.

The two premiums are yours, from real quotes for the same face amount, because insurance pricing is the one thing a calculator must never invent. Give the page the two quotes, an assumed growth rate for the invested side and an assumed crediting rate for the cash value, and it prices the same money in the two places, year by year, for the whole term.

About this term vs whole life insurance calculator

‘Buy term and invest the difference’ is a slogan that skips the arithmetic: the two policies differ in price and in duration. The term-versus-whole-life calculator takes the two monthly premiums you supply from real quotes for the same face amount, invests the difference on the term side and credits the whole-life cash value at the rates you enter, and prints the two balances side by side for the whole term.

The method is shown step by step, and the headline answer is the difference between the two balances at the end of the term — recomputable from the numbers printed on the page. The site sells no data and moves no leads for any insurer; there is no brokerage and no funnel to a quote form.

A comparison like this is not a recommendation, and insurance pricing is your quotes only: health, underwriting and the exact policy contract decide the real cost, and only a licensed agent or advisor can quote it. Nothing on this page is financial, insurance or tax advice.

How this term vs whole life insurance calculator works

One outflow, split two ways

For the same face amount the whole-life premium is larger because it contains a savings piece: the level premium covers the death benefit and, on top of that, funds the cash value. The page takes the difference between the two monthly premiums as the amount both sides commit - the defaults are $235 against $35 on $500,000 of cover, so $200 a month - and that is what keeps the comparison fair. The term household is not spending less; it is putting the same money somewhere else.

If the whole-life premium comes in below the term premium, the gap is floored at zero rather than going negative, and a warning note says so in plain words. With no extra budget entered, every row of the table is then zero. That is a statement about the two quotes rather than a verdict on either policy, and it usually means the face amounts or the medical ratings differ between them.

Two places the savings piece can grow

Both sides are modelled the same way: a fixed deposit compounded monthly for the length of the term, landing at the end of each month. Only the rate differs. The term side uses the market rate you assume, 7% by default. The policy side uses the crediting rate you assume, 4% by default - and that figure is an assumption on this page, not a column lifted from an insurer illustration.

On the defaults the split is stark. After 20 years, $200 a month at 7% reaches $104,185 while the same $200 at 4% reaches $73,355, a gap of $30,830.40 in favor of investing. Move the two rates and the answer moves with them: at 6% credited inside the policy against 5% in the market, the policy leads by roughly $10,200, and the headline label flips to name that side instead of printing a negative number under a claim about investing.

The term runs out, and that is the point

Term cover has a level price only for the term; renewing afterwards is sharply dearer. The strategy is meant to have built the invested side so that the household no longer needs the policy at that age, which is why the page prints the age the term ends and flags the renewal in the headline as a cost the comparison does not model. The age is age plus term length, and when that sum passes the 119-year ceiling of the SSA table the page stops printing an age at all and explains the cap instead.

The page also prices the protection itself as cost per $1,000 of face amount a month - seven cents on the defaults - because that figure is what makes quotes comparable between insurers. Face amount sits in the denominator, so a quote written for a different benefit changes that number and the comparison stops being apples to apples.

What the page deliberately leaves out

The cash value grows tax-deferred while the invested side gains are taxable, and that asymmetry is not modelled - so the invested column is flattered relative to a taxable account. Fees, policy dividends, riders and the exact repricing of a renewed term are all absent, as is the possibility of lapsing the whole-life policy early and paying surrender charges.

Spare money is handled on both sides, not one: anything in the extra budget field is deposited monthly into the investment account and treated as paid-up additions on the policy side, growing at the crediting rate. With $100 a month on top, both columns rise by half - $156,278 against $110,032 - and the gap stays $46,245.61. The assumed rates are inputs, not promises: the page recombines your two quotes, it does not price insurance for you.

Worked examples

Each example below was run through the calculator on this page when the site was built, so the numbers match what you see when you enter the same inputs.

The default pair, priced over a 20-year term

Your age now: 35 years · Face amount both quotes are for: $500,000.00 · Term length: 20 years · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Cash-value growth: 4 % · Investment growth: 7 % · Extra you can commit each month: $0.00

Investing beats the policy cash value by

$30,830.40

$200.00 a month for 20 years, then the policy renews dearer than this page assumes

Cover amount: $500,000 · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Invested each month: $200.00

The $200 premium gap is invested each month, and at the assumed 7% the term-plus-invested side clears the policy cash value by the number in the headline — the difference over the whole term, at the same outflow from both households.

A shorter term and a faster-growth assumption

Your age now: 40 years · Face amount both quotes are for: $400,000.00 · Term length: 10 years · Term premium: $40.00 · Whole-life premium: $300.00 · Cash-value growth: 4 % · Investment growth: 8 % · Extra you can commit each month: $0.00

Investing beats the policy cash value by

$9,281.02

$260.00 a month for 10 years, then the policy renews dearer than this page assumes

Cover amount: $400,000 · Term premium: $40.00 · Whole-life premium: $300.00 · Invested each month: $260.00

Ten years gives the invested side less runway, but an 8% assumption on a $260 monthly gap still outgrows a 4% crediting rate: the short horizon favors whatever the money can earn, which is why the page runs the two sides on equal ground.

A whole-life policy with a generous crediting rate

Your age now: 35 years · Face amount both quotes are for: $500,000.00 · Term length: 20 years · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Cash-value growth: 6 % · Investment growth: 5 % · Extra you can commit each month: $0.00

The policy cash value beats investing by

$10,201.45

$200.00 a month for 20 years, then the policy renews dearer than this page assumes

Cover amount: $500,000 · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Invested each month: $200.00

Flip the rates — 6% credited to the cash value, 5% assumed on the invested side — and the policy cash value stays ahead for most of the term. The difference column makes the crossover visible year by year instead of hiding it behind a preference.

Extra monthly money, committed to both sides

Your age now: 35 years · Face amount both quotes are for: $500,000.00 · Term length: 20 years · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Cash-value growth: 4 % · Investment growth: 7 % · Extra you can commit each month: $100.00

Investing beats the policy cash value by

$46,245.61

$300.00 a month for 20 years, then the policy renews dearer than this page assumes

Cover amount: $500,000 · Term premium: $35.00 · Whole-life premium: $235.00 · Invested each month: $300.00

A further $100 a month is invested on the term side and treated as paid-up additions inside the policy on the whole-life side, so the extra money is compared honestly rather than handed to whichever side you happened to like.

Frequently asked questions

Why is whole life so much more expensive?

Because part of every dollar is a savings payment, not a protection payment. The premium has to fund both the death benefit and a cash value that grows for decades, so the same face amount simply costs several times as much. This page exists to price that difference: it invests the gap on the term side, at a rate you choose, and lets the two balances race for the full term.

Is the invested side really comparable to a cash value?

As money, yes — both households commit the same monthly outflow. As guarantees, no, and the page says so: the whole-life cash value and the death benefit are insurer-backed promises, while the invested side is a forecast at an assumed rate. If the invested rate lands below the crediting rate, the line flips. Nobody can promise a market return, which is exactly why the page prints both rows.

Does the cash value grow tax-free?

It grows tax-deferred — the gain is not taxed while it stays inside the policy — while the invested side’s gains are generally taxable as they are earned or realized. That asymmetry is real and it favors the policy, and the page does not model it, so the invested side starts with a handicap the comparison makes no allowance for.

What happens when the term runs out?

A renewing term is priced for an older age and costs a great deal more. The strategy is meant to have grown the invested side to the point where the household does not need the policy — the page prints the age that happens, on the assumption that the market rate holds. If the investment underperforms, the household faces either a dearer renewal or a hole in its protection, and neither is modelled away.

Does this page sell insurance?

No. The two premiums come from quotes you bring, and the page only recombines them. Danfio sells no data and takes no commission from any insurer; there is no brokerage, no lead form and no reason for the answer to lean one way.

Assumptions and sources

  • The comparison is arithmetic on the two premiums you enter — term and whole life priced for the same face amount — rather than any insurer rate table, because insurance pricing depends on health, age and the particular carrier.
  • The whole-life side credits its cash value at the rate you enter and the invested side compounds at the rate you enter; both are assumptions on the page, and the difference column reports the crossover year by year rather than hiding it.
  • Term renewals are typically repriced at the insured’s attained age and are not guaranteed; this page flags the renewal in the headline sub line and does not model the higher price.
  • Tax treatment is not modelled: whole-life cash value grows tax-deferred, while gains on an ordinary investment are generally taxable.

Last reviewed 2026-10-06. Not investment or insurance advice; quotes come from a licensed provider. Read the full disclaimer.

Where a figure on this page comes from an official agency — HUD, IRS, FICO or a state body — the site keeps a dated snapshot of the source page in its sources library, and a scheduled job re-checks that snapshot, so the number can be traced back to the document it came from.