Cost of Living Calculator - Danfio
https://danfio.com/tools/cost-of-living-calculator/ - printed from this page
Currency: USD ($) - display only, nothing was converted
Pay that matches $75,000 in Texas
$86,890 in California
BEA’s 2023 price parities put California 15.9% above Texas for the same basket of household spending - $11,890 more on this pay.
- Texas index
- 97.2
- California index
- 112.6
- Biggest single gap
- Housing +60.4 Index points: 97.4 → 157.8
- National index
- 100 United States, by construction
Where the difference comes from
| Spending category | Texas | California | Gap |
|---|
| Housing | 97.4 | 157.8 | +60.4 |
| Goods | 98.4 | 107.5 | +9.1 |
| Utilities | 92.7 | 142.1 | +49.4 |
| Other services | 96.4 | 104.8 | +8.4 |
| All items | 97.2 | 112.6 | +15.4 |
Housing is where two places usually differ most, and it is also the part of a budget that is hardest to move: a basket of groceries travels unchanged, a rent does not. Goods prices are the flattest of the four.
The same $75,000 in every state
| State | Price index (US = 100) | Pay that matches |
|---|
| California | 112.6 | $86,890 |
| District of Columbia | 110.8 | $85,519 |
| New Jersey | 108.9 | $84,036 |
| Hawaii | 108.6 | $83,825 |
| Washington | 108.6 | $83,789 |
| Massachusetts | 108.2 | $83,538 |
| New York | 107.6 | $83,066 |
| New Hampshire | 105.3 | $81,306 |
| Oregon | 104.7 | $80,824 |
| Maryland | 104 | $80,241 |
| Connecticut | 103.7 | $80,028 |
| Florida | 103.5 | $79,845 |
| Alaska | 101.7 | $78,504 |
| Rhode Island | 101.4 | $78,270 |
| Colorado | 101.4 | $78,247 |
| Arizona | 101.1 | $78,033 |
| Virginia | 100.7 | $77,758 |
| Delaware | 99.3 | $76,604 |
| Illinois | 98.9 | $76,297 |
| Minnesota | 98.4 | $75,959 |
| Pennsylvania | 97.5 | $75,251 |
| Texas | 97.2 | $75,000 |
| Maine | 97.1 | $74,940 |
| Nevada | 97 | $74,849 |
| Georgia | 96.7 | $74,633 |
| Vermont | 96.6 | $74,583 |
| Utah | 95 | $73,323 |
| Michigan | 94.2 | $72,692 |
| North Carolina | 94.1 | $72,657 |
| South Carolina | 93.2 | $71,914 |
| Wisconsin | 93.1 | $71,853 |
| Tennessee | 92.5 | $71,403 |
| Indiana | 92.2 | $71,148 |
| Ohio | 91.8 | $70,861 |
| Missouri | 91.8 | $70,822 |
| Idaho | 91.4 | $70,562 |
| Wyoming | 90.8 | $70,117 |
| Kentucky | 90.5 | $69,824 |
| New Mexico | 90.4 | $69,760 |
| Nebraska | 90.4 | $69,753 |
| Montana | 90.2 | $69,651 |
| Alabama | 90 | $69,439 |
| Kansas | 90 | $69,435 |
| West Virginia | 89.8 | $69,286 |
| Iowa | 88.8 | $68,511 |
| North Dakota | 88.6 | $68,360 |
| Louisiana | 88.3 | $68,185 |
| Oklahoma | 88.3 | $68,139 |
| South Dakota | 88.1 | $67,992 |
| Mississippi | 87.3 | $67,372 |
| Arkansas | 86.5 | $66,767 |
Ranked from the most expensive state to the cheapest on the all-items index. The headline figure is priced in California, and this column restates the same pay in every state so the ranking can be read down the page. Metro areas are in the two menus above rather than in this table, because 384 more rows would be a page about two places and a directory of 435.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, "Regional Price Parities by State and Metro Area", 2023 (United States = 100). Two tables from one official file: 51 jurisdictions (50 states + DC) and 384 metropolitan areas, 435 places in all, all on the same scale. It is imported by scripts/import-rpp.mjs, with that zip's checksum recorded beside the numbers and both tables' national rows checked against each other before the import runs. BEA republishes it every year, and the year is printed on every figure above.
Why there are no Chinese cities here: this page is built on the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis’s regional price parities, where the whole United States is 100. China’s National Bureau of Statistics publishes a consumer price change rate for its cities, not a comparable price level index, and third-party datasets such as Numbeo are anchored on New York = 100 rather than on this table’s scale. Dividing one anchor by another would produce a number that looks precise and means nothing, so this tool stays inside a single publisher’s scale and covers the United States only. A gap in coverage is better than an invented figure - and when a Chinese price-level series is published on a documented, comparable basis, this is where it would be added, with its source printed beside it.
A price index is a basket, not a life. It says nothing about income tax or sales tax, property tax, commuting distance, utility connection rules, rent control, school districts or what a particular neighborhood costs - and the two biggest items in a real move, housing and pay, are usually renegotiated rather than converted. Read the number as "the same spending costs this much more there", then do the budget properly.